Adoptions, Child Trafficking and Exploitation
BOMBSHELL: Clinton Body Count Blown Wide Open, Organ Trafficking Title- BOMBSHELL- Attorney Afraid For Her Life Blows Clinton Body Count Wide Open BOMBSHELL: ATTORNEY CONNECTS DNC CLINTON BUSH CHENEY MAYO TO BLACK MARKET ORGAN HARVESTING
Exploitation for Hollywood: Charged Child Molestor "Pimping" Out Daughter On-Line Meet Katrina (Kitty) Sellers/Hufstetler/McCaffery apparently has foster children (CPS Involvement) Trying to exploit and sell out children is illegal in Russia however for Hollywood child exploitation is the norm and in the US these actions are legal. Strangely while "pimping out" her "daughter" on-line her company offers "online privacy and reputation control". No long commentary or investigation needed here, I think her own actions, despite her pretending to be a champion of children, speak for themselves. http://fauxrealityentertainment.com/trolls/did-rise-and-stand-defraud-celebrity-kristen-johnston/ https://twitter.com/KittyMcCaffery http://www.mccafferymedia.com/services.html http://m.imdb.com/name/nm6618630/
Foreign child adoption as sound “investment” and business for Americans, or why Dima Yakovlev Law is necessary to protect Russian children
23
January, 21:44
As the
media and the public debate the Dima Yakovlev Law the real reasons for the
law are being lost in the debate, namely the abuse of Russian adoptees by
American adoptive parents and the fact that American officials are not
allowing Russian officials access to children who are Russian citizens in
order to verify that they are being cared for in an appropriate manner.
Russia seeks to protect its most defenseless citizens, it is as simple as
that.
With the
passing of the Dima Yakovlev law many Russians are debating the issue of
adoptions and sadly another rift, albeit small has appeared in Russian
society due to America’s actions. What is being lost in the debate here in
Russia as sides point fingers at each other, namely the Western backed
“opposition” who come out on every occasion to belittle any decision are
action that protects Russia’s sovereignty and those who are interested in
the well being of Russian children, is the real reason for the Dima Yakovlev
law: the deaths and murders of Russian adoptees at the hands of their
American foster parents.
Many have
said the law was in answer to the U.S. Magnitsky Act, however this is far
from the case. The real reason was the continued abuse of Russian adoptees
by American adoptive parents and the obfuscation and interference by the US
authorities in granting Russian Officials access to Russian adoptees in
order to check their well-being. It is important to recall that all Russian
adoptees are Russian citizens until their 18th birthday and Russia is simply
seeking to protect the rights of its smallest and most defenseless citizens.
Why
Americans adopt foreign children
To start
off I think it is important to look at why Americans want to adopt Russian
children in the first place. One reason is because they did not have to go
through the extensive background checks and even the US checks that exist
are more lenient when it comes foreign adoptions.
Another
and perhaps more significant reason is the simple fact that most American
adoptive parents are white and many openly state of their dream to have a
blonde blue-eyed white child, problematic in the US where parents may have
only children from other race groups to choose from or where the competition
for the child of their choice is too great or the wait could take years.
“Parents”
such as these are not interested in charity or providing a child with a good
life but are in reality simply engaged in the act of “buying goods” to
fulfill whatever motivations they have for pursuing the “purchase” in the
first place.
The
argument they may use that a white child is easier to integrate into a white
family may seem valid on the surface but true familial harmony has nothing
to do with racial make-up, unless you are a racist of course.
For
adoptions agencies and child “brokers” engaged in the business of selling
and buying children for their clients, having a source of cheap white
children was a “God-send”. Like anything where there is a demand there is
always someone ready to capitalize on that demand and fill it, and for them
Russia was ideal.
One
“Christian” organization in Russia openly states that the cost of a Russian
child was $5,000, almost nothing when Americans are ready to pay from
$35,000 to $120,000 for a white blue-eyed child. The profits to be had are
huge.
Of course
it is distasteful to call the process what it is; “the buying and selling of
children”, especially for the parents, so the agencies and those involved
have to come up with mountains of supportive arguments and self-satisfying
reasoning to make their business palatable to the world at large.
The
constant propaganda against Russia and the “deplorable conditions in Russian
orphanages”, etc etc ad-nauseum by people who have never set foot in a
Russian orphanage or even in the Russian Federation is necessary to assist
them in selling their product and placating the consciences of people who
are uprooting a child from the child’s natural surrounding and attempting to
recreate the child in whatever image they desire on the other side of the
planet.
Another
reason Americans seek to adopt children from overseas is the fear that the
birth mother may show up and “interfere” in the upbringing of the child or
take the child away altogether, something which may happen in the US if for
example; a mother had her child taken away due to substance abuse issues and
has since reformed her behavior.
All of
these reasons; the long waiting lists, the stricter internal US controls,
the fact that the birth mother may show up at any moment, the fact that the
child itself may seek out its mother or father, make adopting children from
a foreign country attractive to Americans. There are also issues with
parents who may have an affinity for a country or possess imperialistic
sentiments assuaged by the fact that they “possess” a person from a certain
country and can make them “American”.
Another
fact that few pay attention to but is also important is the tax breaks that
Americans may receive for adopting foreign children, there is the primary
tax break for having a dependent child (applicable to all adoptions) and
then tax breaks for foreign travel and “charitable contributions” if the
adoption is done for example through a “Christian” organization. Again, from
a “business” viewpoint a very sound “investment”, and from an oversight
viewpoint such organizations enjoy almost no oversight by the authorities.
Unfortunately no serious studies on the subject have been done and data is
extremely difficult to find as to the primary driving motivations so what
you have just read are the results of my own research on the matter at hand.
Adoptions
and adoptees in the US
Most of
the information about adoptions in the US is almost impossible to find and
even the number of actual children eligible for adoption is a fact that is
not available to the public. As an example; in one state an adoptive parent,
who went through all of the steps to be allowed to adopt a child and was
finally allowed to “choose” a child, was shocked to learn that apart from
the 30 children she was at first told were available, there were in fact
more than 500 more in her state.
According
to official data; in the US the figures regarding international as opposed
to internal adoptions stands at roughly 20% international and 40% from the
foster care system and 40% from private adoptions.
Currently
there are officially about 129,000 children in the US in the foster care
system ready for adoption and the number from private adoptions may be far
greater bringing the number of children in the US waiting to be adopted to
what could be close to half a million or more, this does not include
children who the states are waiting to take parental rights away from.
The US
does not officially list children as being eligible for adoption until the
parents have lost all parental rights and states intentionally refrain from
taking this final step until there are adoptive parents, making the number
of children eligible for adoption but not on official lists possibly ten
times greater.
Child
homicide and abuse in the US: stats and figures
In 2008, a
year I was able to find data on, there were approximately 1,494 child
homicides in the United States. Of those killed 1,035 were male, while 453
were female, these figures are more or less average with reports seeing an
increase in the past few years.
Indeed,
even the 19 Russian-born children who died while in the care of their
adoptive parents are a tiny minority of the 60,000 Russian children who have
been adopted in the United States since 1991. Using this number, the death
rate of Russian adoptees is 1.5 per 100,000 per year. By comparison, the
general child fatality rate due to neglect and abuse has hovered around 2.2
deaths per 100,000 children per year over the past few years in the US. One
might argue from the facts that Americans kill more of their own children
than Russian children, but the point is moot when even one death is
unacceptable.
Some more
figures: in the US in 2011 an estimated 1,570 children died of abuse and
neglect, making the numbers: 2.1 per 100,000, and in the past 6 years the
number has fluctuated between a high of 1,608 in 2007 and a low of 1,494 in
2008.
By age the
number of children killed in the US is disproportionately high when it comes
to children under 3. In 2011: 98 3-year-olds were murdered, 166 2-year-olds,
229 1-year-olds and 534 children under the age of one were murdered by their
caregivers, making almost 82% of all murdered children in America under the
age of 4.
According
to US Government statistics for 2011 the race of parents who murdered their
children is as follows: 490 children were killed by white parents (40.5%),
341 by black parents (28.2%) and 215 by Hispanic parents (17.8%), figures
from which any number of conclusions could be reached.
The
figures for those killed by neglect stand at 895 deaths (71.1%), from abuse
602 dead (47.9%) with the rest dying from other causes.
An
argument in defense of adoptive parents might be had from the fact that
there were 617,858 cases of abuse reported by parents in 2011 and by
adoptive parents only 5,108. This could be attributed to the fact that
adoptive parents are generally better educated and more well-off than the
majority of the population.
How do
Americans abuse their children? According to US Government figures for 2011
61% of parents abusing their children were guilty of neglect, 9.7%
physically abused their children and a whopping 6.2% sexually abused their
own children or those in their care.
Crime and
Punishment
Sadly, in
a country where rapists get an average of 65 months in prison before they
are prowling the streets again (according to figures by the FBI), hackers
get approximately 10 years for DDoS attacks, and anyone the state deems a
“terrorist” can be disappeared for life, parents who murder their own
children, and in particular those who murder Russian orphans, get away with
nothing more than a slap on the wrist if they are repentant.
Moral
low-ground
The United
States has long ago lost its self-perceived position as the world’s moral
compass for many reasons, one being the situation surrounding adopted
children, others being all of the war crimes, aggressive wars, droning,
torture and human rights violations that have existed and come to light
since 9-11.
Yet
another no less important indicator is the Official US refusal to sign and
comply with international treaties and norms including: the Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), the Convention for the
Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance, the Mine Ban Treaty,
the Convention on Cluster Munitions, the Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (CRPD) and the Optional Protocol to the Convention against
Torture.
The US is
the only country in the world, other than Somalia, that has not ratified the
Convention on the Rights of the Child, the most widely and rapidly ratified
human rights treaty in history. As for the CEDAW, it is one of only seven
countries including: Iran, Nauru, Palau, Somalia, Sudan and Tonga that has
failed to ratify the convention.
One might
argue that the US has ratified the Hague Conventions on International
Adoptions, however there is no recourse for violations to the conventions
and they are largely ignored.
Despite
all of the above many Americans feel that, while dictating to the world what
to do and meddling into the affairs of any nation they choose to, any
“foreign” oversight or monitoring is somehow an attack on their sovereignty.
Hence the obfuscation faced by Russian Officials when it comes to checking
on the welfare of Russian adoptees.
US Society
As I said
before: having lived in both Russia and the U.S. for decades I can honestly
say that any Russian travelling to the U.S. would be shocked at the number
of stories and cases of child abuse and atrocities against children that
exist in the United States and that no one hears about in the filtered
international U.S. media.
Societal
violence, sexual deviation and the mentality of Americans in seeing every
country in the world as being beneath their own contempt make it dangerous
for children from other countries to be adopted by Americans. Predators see
isolated foreign children as prime targets as they are defenseless and in
most cases too afraid to fight back or speak out, which leads to an
escalation of the violence against themselves.
For
decades few people have understood the reality that in America it is not all
milk and honey, yet Russians are beginning to wake up. The Russian
Government in particular, with the expulsion of USAID, which was heavily
involved in subverting the Russian state, and also in the whole children’s
care sphere, has finally begun to take measures against the carefully
planned and subtle encroachment on Russia’s sovereignty.
Russians
must congratulate the government and President Putin for having the courage
and foresight to take measures to protect the Russian Federation and the
Russian people and most importantly protect Russia’s defenseless children
who were being “sold” to America. Unfortunately after decades of pro-US
propaganda many in Russia still believe the lies they have been fed and
unfortunately do not know the real motives behind organizations such USAID.
With
higher education almost out of reach for the majority of Americans the
overall population is one of the worst educated in the world. The societal
glorification of violence and force is exacerbated by lack of education,
resulting in a situation where many see violence as the only solution,
including when it comes to resolving issues with children.
America’s
own problems concerning unwanted children are also not helped and possibly
driven by the church and the whole anti-abortion craze which has caused
millions of unwanted children that no one really cares about adopting.
Economic
concerns and the breakdown down in the family, the primary societal unit,
also have led to a situation where children are paying the price in America.
Despite
all of this the US Media is continuously biased against Russia, and any
other country in the world for that matter, and continues to perpetuate the
myth that most Americans themselves refuse to part with, that America is the
land of milk and honey and everywhere else is “third world”.
Russian
falacies
One of
these myths is the argument by the Russian opposition that disabled Russian
orphans have nowhere to go. According to the Pavel Astakhov, the Russian
President’s Ombudsman on Children’s Rights, there are more Russian parents
ready to adopt Russian orphans than there are children.
There are
also hundreds of thousands of disabled American children for Americans to
adopt and if there were really charitable motivations behind the actions of
these adoptive parents, they would adopt their own disabled children first,
but they don’t. Americans who want to adopt Russian children, as I said
above, are not interested in charity, they are interested in obtaining a
cheap white blue-eyed Russian baby.
I can not
say there are no Americans who are driven by charity, there are some and
they must be applauded, but they are few and generally they are overburdened
and run group homes which attempt to deal with the needs of these special
children in an environment where there is minimal support.
As for
Russia and I can say this honestly and with the insight of an educator, the
respect for children is much higher than in the U.S. and the level of crimes
and cases of inhumane acts against children are so much lower as to almost
be non-existent if one compares them to the U.S.
In the
better part of two decades here there have been less than a dozen high
profile cases of crimes against children and once again I cannot help but to
compare that with the almost daily onslaught in the U.S. media of cases of
child abuse, kidnappings, child murders and pedophilia.
Not only
Russia
Russia is
not the only country that has put a halt to American adoptions. One
important source for children used by those in the child trade business was
Guatemala. In 2008 it was the leading country providing children for
Americans with 4,123 children being adopted by Americans. Several countries
have also drastically cut back on the number of adoptions to America or
increased the requirements on those wishing to adopt, these include:
Ethiopia, Vietnam, South Korea and even China.
Murdered
Children
Since the
‘90s 19 Russian children have died at the hands of their American adopted
parents.
1. Ivan
Skorobogatov “Nathaniel Craver” aged 7, died August 25, 2009 after being
taken off life support in Hershey Pennsylvania. The autopsy revealed Vanya
suffered 80 external injuries, including 20 to the head and had been abused
for an extended period of time. His killers Michael and Nannette Craver were
released after time served.
2. Dmitry
Yakovlev, “Chase Harrison” aged 21 months, died July 8, 2008 in Herndon,
Virginia. Child was baked alive in the back of the car of adopted “father”
Miles Harrison, who “forgot” the child and was acquitted of any wrongdoing
in the murder of the infant. His killer was released.
3.
Nickolai (Kolya ) Emelyantsev, 14-months-old, died on March 7, 2008 in
Tooele Utah. He was murdered by his adoptive mother Kimberly Emelyantsev, he
died of a fractured skull after being repeatedly bashed on a concrete floor
and had cuts and bruises to over 90% percent of his little body. His killer
has already been released.
4. Denis
Uritsky “Dennis Gene Merryman” 8-years-old. Died January 22, 2005 in Harford
County, Maryland of cardiac arrest brought on by starvation. At 3 he weighed
40 pounds, at the time of death he weighed 37. His killers were released
then received 22 years each.
5.
Victoria Bazhenova “Nina Hilt”. 2.5-years-old. Died July 2, 2005 in
Manassas, Virginia of blows and internal injuries to the abdominal area
after being repeatedly kick and punched in the stomach and back. Murdered by
Peggy Sue Hilt. Killer sentenced to approximately 20 years.
6.
Konstantin Shlepin “David Polreis Jr” aged 2. Died February 9, 1996 in
Greeley, Colorado after being beaten to death. Had cuts and bruises over 90%
of his body. Killed by Renee Polreis. Killer was released in 2005.
7. Logan
Higginbotham aged 3. Died November 25, 1998 in Shelburne, Vermont of massive
head injuries after being slammed into a wall. Killer Laura Higginbotham was
sentenced to 1 year and has been released.
8. Viktor
Sergeivich Tulimov “Viktor Matthey” aged 6. Died October 31, 2000 in
Hunterdon County, New Jersey of hypothermia after being locked in an
unheated service room overnight. Had over 40 cuts and bruises on his body as
well as untreated bone fractures. Killers Robert and Brenda Matthey were
released in 2008.
9. Luke
Evans aged 1.5 years. Died November 30, 2001 in Lowell, Indiana of massive
head injuries and shaken baby syndrome. His killer Natalie Fabian Evans was
found not guilty and released.
10. Alexei
Vasilovich Geiko “Alex Pavlis” 6-years-old. Died December 18, 2003 in
Schaumburg, Illinois of massive injuries after going into a coma. His killer
Iram Pavlis was sentenced to 12 years in prison but was released in 2008.
11. Ilya
Kargyntsev “Isaac Jonathan Dykstra” aged 21 months. Died August 14, 2005 in
Iowa City, Iowa of massive internal injuries. Killer Brian Dykstra was
charged with 2nd degree murder then acquitted. Free 12. Jacob Lindroff aged
5. Died December 14, 2001 in Gloucester Township, New Jersey of a blunt
force trauma to the head. Jacob has 2nd degree burns on his feet. Killers
James and Heather Lindroff have been released. They were later charged with
conspiracy to commit murder after attempting to hire a someone to kill a
witness in the case. They are free after those charges as well.
13.
Jessica Albina Hagmann age 2 years 7 months. Died August 11, 2003 in Prince
William County, Virginia of mechanical asphyxia due to compression against
an adult: lack of blood and oxygen. Jessica weighed only 27 pounds when she
died and was covered with bruises including multiple bruises and cuts to her
face and head. Killer Patrice Lynn Hagmann received 2 suspended sentences
and has been released.
14. Dmitry
Sergeyevich Ishlankulov “Liam Dmitry Thompson” aged 3. Died October 16, 2003
in Columbus, Ohio of burns to his entire body after being boiled alive in a
bathtub in 140 degree water and placed in a crib in a freezing basement for
five days. Killers Gary Allen Thompson received 15 years. Will probably be
released in 2018. Killer Amy Thompson will be released in 2017.
15. Maria
Anastasia Bennett aged 2. Died October 23, 2002 in Columbus Ohio of fatal
head wounds and eye injuries. Her killer Susan Jane Bennett received 3 years
with release after 2 years and the probation. She has been released.
16. Sacha
Vallée aged 4. Died October 9, 2002 in Verdun, Quebec, Canada after being
beaten for 4 days, dropped on his face, punched in the stomach and left
outside in the Canadian winter. His killer Eric Grenier was found guilty of
non-premeditated homicide and sentenced to life in prison with no
possiblility of parole for 12 years( by Canada).
17. Nikita
Khoryakovont “Zachary Higier” aged 2. Died August 15, 2002 in Braintree,
Massachusetts of a bilateral skull fracture, a massive stroke on the right
side of his brain, a smaller stroke on left side, brain swelling and
detached retinas consistent with a fall from a 3 storey building. Killer
Natalia Higier was sentenced to 2 1/2 years. Has been released
18 and19
Yana and Anatoly Kolenda. Both aged 11. Died on October 21, 2002 in
Westfield, Massachusetts after being brutally murdered by the Richard
Kolenda who then killed the adoptive mother and later shot himself in the
head.
Then there
are multiple cases of abuse such as:
Kuzma
Cochran, 4-years-old. Abused by Jane and Timothy Cochran. Kuzma was
tortured, had bruises over 90% of his body, was beaten and had a piece of
his ear cut off. Abusers received 3 and 2 months. Were released.
Kelsey
Hyre, aged 2, living in Akron Ohio and permanently paralyzed on September
26, 2002 when her spine severed by Gerald Hyre after he slammed her on the
floor.
Russian
children should be cared for and looked after by Russian parents or
caregivers, especially in light of the lack of access allowed Russian
Officials to Russian children abroad, in reality that is in the best
interest of the children. As for America they should take more steps to
solve their own internal issues with regards to child abuse and child
homicide before dragging in the international community and asking it to
accept the atrocious conditions faced by adoptees in America. In short
America should be banned from all international adoptions until they can
take care of their own children.
US Pseudo Political Correctness and the Russian Orphans Murdered in America 20
July 2012, 15:36 http://www.jar2.com/Topics/Child_Trafficking_Adoptions.html One
area where there is no room for rhetoric or for false attempts at being
politically correct is the area of international adoptions and the welfare
of the smallest and most defenseless individuals among us. We have seen this
many times before in case after case of Russian orphans and adoptees
suffering abuse and even death at the hands of their American adoptive
parents. Time
and time again, in almost every aspect of Russian-Western relations, we have
seen anti-Russian hysteria and pseudo-political correctness raise its ugly
head. It is something that many are used to and something that more and more
Westerners are beginning to notice.
Recently the Children’s
Rights Ombudsman of the Russian Federation Pavel Astakhov and Russian Human
Rights Envoy Konstantin Dolgov, attempted to visit a “ranch” for adopted
children in remote northwestern Montana. The purpose of the visit was to
check on the well-being of the reportedly 10 Russian adoptees that were at
the ranch and who according to
RIA-Novosti
were removed shortly before Mr. Astakhov’s visit. On
his official website Mr. Astakhov, who has been diligently fighting for the
rights of Russian children worldwide, stated the following: "The very fact
of the children being there is shocking. What is it, a pre-trial detention
facility? A penal colony? Or a trash can for unwanted children?"
"These children are completely isolated from the outside world, which is
grounds for violating their rights. It has not been made clear to us whether
the children receive the necessary help and treatment, which is why the
condition of the Russian kids at the ranch causes concerns," Astakhov said. Were
the children from any other country these concerns would have been granted
the level of respect they deserve, especially when the safety and welfare of
children are at their core and everything would have been done to ensure
that the issue was properly looked at. Sadly this did not occur.
Instead the pseudo politically correct machine that is the U.S. mass media
began an onslaught, not on the ranch’s owner, one Joyce Sterkel, but on Mr.
Astakhov and the group of Russian government officials that travelled with
him. The AP published a huge piece of more than three pages in length full of anti-Russian quotes by Sterkel, which are not worth repeating here, with almost nothing about the children or Mr. Astakhov’s concerns, even referring to the ombudsman as “one of them.” ABCNews Six
days later the AP published 7 sentences regarding the illegality of Ms.
Sterkel’s ranch. Which has not had a license to operate since 2010, has been
ordered closed and where inspectors have not been allowed. Other problems at
the ranch include a failure to show the structures on the ranch meet the
building code, no disaster plan and no background checks on employees.
Again nowhere are the stories about the children in question or regarding
their well-being - for the U.S. media they are not even a side issue. It is
as if they do not exist.
Sterkel has not only denied the Russian inspectors entry onto the so-called
ranch but has also denied the Montana state board any information about the
children at the ranch according to board attorney Mary Tapper.
Statements in the U.S. press regarding sovereignty, intrusion, and privacy
rights have no place in a dialogue involving the safety and welfare of
children, wherever they may be from. However the U.S. is a country where in
many cases pseudo political correctness comes first and the rights and
safety of children come second. The
Reverend Peter Mullen in his blog on the Mail Online put it well when
describing the influence of political correctness on adoptions in the
Western system: “The scandal is that our Mephistophelian “caring
institutions” would rather a child be aborted than that the mother should
give birth and so present them with all these tiresome pseudo-problems
derived entirely from political correctness.”
Having lived in both Russia and the U.S. for decades I can honestly say that
any Russian travelling to the U.S. would be shocked at the number of stories
and cases of child abuse and atrocities against children that exist in the
United States and that no one hears about in the filtered international U.S.
media. The
U.S. culture of death, sex, violence, hypocrisy and perversion is often
reflected on the horrors that children become the victims of. The record has
shown with regard to Russian orphans that the controls that exist for other
orphans are just not there and that many adoptive parents feel that because
they somehow “rescued” the children from some “terrible” faraway place they
can do whatever they want to the children with impunity. As
for Russia and I can say this honestly and with the insight of an educator,
the respect for children is much higher than in the U.S. and the level of
crimes and cases of inhumane acts against children are so much lower as to
almost be non-existent if one compares them to the U.S. In
the better part of two decades here there have been less than a dozen high
profile cases of crimes against children. Once again I can not help but
compare the almost daily onslaught in the U.S. media of cases of child
abuse, kidnappings, child murders and pedophilia.
Joyce Sterkel did not allow the Russian delegation to inspect the facility
in question, nor has she provided the Board of Private Alternative
Adolescent Residential and Outdoor Programs any information about the
children. She also removed the children from the premises before Mr.
Astakhov arrived. What is she so afraid might be discovered? And what is
really going on at the isolated and remote Deep Springs Ranch for Kids? The
pseudo-politically-correct U.S. establishment may have a problem asking
those questions, but I don’t, and for the sake of the children they must be
answered.
ECHR Ruling: Apparently Americans Have Right to Russian Children! Title- ECHR decision on ‘Dima Yakovlev Law’ does not mean it should be revised — Justice Ministry
Pizzagate: Late Nancy Schaefer; The Corrupt Business Of Child Protective Services Book: The Corrupt Business Of Child Protective Services by the Late Nancy Schaefer
|